Here is a list of legitimate alternatives to the popular SEO tool, Ahrefs .
In this post I am going to:
- List out 7 SEO tools which you can use instead of Ahrefs
- Show you how each of them compares to Ahrefs
- My personal experience with each tool
So if Ahrefs isn't right for you, check out the list below for your best options.
The 7 best Ahrefs alternatives
In my opinion, Ubersuggest is one of the best free SEO tools on the market.
Because it has a wide range of features, including:
- Keyword research
- Topic research (like BuzzSumo)
- Analysis of backs
- SEO audit reports
- And more
And each of them is solid.
In fact, if you are new to SEO, Ubersuggest is a solid option.
Now: Ubersuggest was previously 100% free. But they recently rolled out a paid plan .
The free version is still solid. But if you want to access more features or get more reports, the paid plan may be a good option for you. For example, with a plan paid for, you get unlimited SEO audit reports.
Which is useful if you have SEO clients or manage a bunch of websites.
How Ubersuggest is compare to Ahrefs
As I said above, Ubersuggest is a high quality tool. That said: it 's not as feature rich as Ahrefs .
So if I had to compare Ubersuggest and Ahrefs side-by-side purely on functionality, I would choose Ahrefs.
But there is another important factor to consider: the cost ensus.
Ahrefs starts at $ 99 / month.
Ubersuggest is a $ 29 / month plan.
If you have a bigmarketing budget, I would probably choose Ahrefs. But in terms of pure value, Ubersuggest definitely comes out on top.
SEMrush is one of the most popular SEO tools popular market.
And for good reason: it 's REALLY good.
In fact, I am a SEMrush customer paid for over 8 years now:
During this period I have seen it evolve from a keyword research tool for PPC to a full- on SEO software suite.
Today, in addition to its standard keyword research features (like search volume, CPC, etc.), SEMrush also has a ton of useful features such as:
- Traffic analysis (where a site gets its traffic)
- Backs analysis
- Tracking Ranking
- SEO site audits
- SEO on-page analysis
- And much more
In my opinion, SEMrush is probableIt is definitely the closest tool to Ahrefs (both in terms of quantity of features and quality).
Comparison between SEMrush and Ahrefs
I have already written a finish the SEMrush vs Ahrefs split here . So if you want a very detailed list of how Ahrefs and SEMrush stack up against each other, take a look at this review.
But the bottom line is that Ahrefs and SEMrush are VERY similar.
Similar in terms of functionality. Similar in terms of quality. And even similar in terms of price.
Personally, I prefer Ahrefs. Mainly because I really like their UX. Specifically, Ahrefs 'excellent UX allows me to do my work easier.
So even though SEMrush has the exact same functionality as Ahrefs, they are harder to find and harder to use.
By example, when you analyze a site in Ahrefs, you have a SUPER useful sidebar that links directly to rappImportant contributions (such as broken links, internal links , and anchor text).
In SEMrush, you also have a sidebar. But it only refers to features.
To find something specific you need to delve into each feature to find exactly what you need.
Now, this is obviously a personal preference. Some people like SEMrush's UX better than Ahrefs.
But in terms of pure functionality, Ahrefs and SEMrush are pretty much related. So if you want an Ahrefs alternative with a list of similar features, I recommend you give SEMrush a try.
Monitor backs declarations "The best backs and keywords monitoring tool, period. "
I first signed up for Monitor Backs in 2015. And I just tried the tool again today.
Now: it has some very interesting features. For example, a disallowance tool.
But the main problem with the tool is that there is really nothing'unique here. Monitor Backs mainly extracts data from Majestic and Moz. And add some bells and whistles (like a ranking tracker).
How Monitor Stacks up against Ahrefs
In my opinion, Monitor Backs isn't starting to compare to Ahrefs. is not close.
For example, with Ahrefs you can extract 10k rows of data from back.
With Monitor Backs, you only get 4 KB.
Also missing is a keyword tool, competitor analysis feature, domain comparisons, organic traffic reports ... and a list of features you get in Ahrefs.
Monitor Backs has a free trial. Which can give you an idea of the tool. So if you want to give it a try, go ahead.
But in my opinion, Monitor Backs is so limited that it hardly qualifies as an alternative to Ahrefs.
Mangools is not your typical SEO software suite.
Instead of a bunch of built-in features, Mangools isactually 5 completely different tools.
For example, let's say you want to see the keywords for which a site is ranking in Google.
Well you will open "KWFinder ", click the "Search by domain " tab and enter the domain you want to search at:
And now you want to see the backs of this site. Well now you have to go back to your dashboard, press "LinkMiner " to open their back tool, and start the whole process again.
So yes, this setup is not ideal. And that makes using the tool A LOT more difficult than necessary.
That said: as of writing in my recent Mangools review , the tools themselves are actually pretty solid. Not quite on the level of SEMrush. But not bad .
I just wish the tools weren't put together.
How Mangools compares to Ahrefs
In my opinion, Mangools is not even in the same universe as Ahrefs.
And I'm not just talking about the fact that it takes 3-5 times moree clicks to do something in Mangools than in Ahrefs.
T its features are also not as strong as Ahrefs.
For example, Mangools 's back scan feature doesn't have as many fi
You basically have filters for dofollow vs. nofollow, active vs. deleted ... And that's about it.
With Ahrefs you can filter by hundreds of things , like link type, language, URL classification, etc.
Which is very useful if you want to explore a specific type of back.
So it's clear that Ahrefs is overall a better SEO tool than Mangools. But is it better value for money?
Mangools 'Basic' package is about half the price of Ahrefs 'Starter' plan.
(Note: if you sign up for an annual plan, the price of Mangools Basic goes down to $ 29).
Personally I don't think so that the price compromise is worth it. I would rather pay twice as much for a tool that is 10 times better. That 's why I am happy to pay for Ahrefs every month.
But thisis ultimately your choice. If you are on a very tight budget, you can still make a lot of money out of Mangools. But if you can make $ 100 per month, I recommend using a tool like Ahrefs or SEMrush.
I'll get right to the point:
Moz Pro isn 't a bad SEO tool.
But that 's not quite on par with its two main competitors: Ahrefs and SEMrush.
The main problem with Moz Pro is that its features have not really kept up with the competition. .
While Ahrefs and SEMrush are constantly rolling out improvements, Moz Pro has really only rolled out one recent feature enhancement: their keyword tool called "Keyword Explorer".
Granted, Moz's Keyword Tool is excellent. And it's particularly good at generating long tail keyword suggestions. But I can say the same about 'Ahrefs and SEMrush.
How Moz Pro Compared to Ahrefs
I recently put a bunch of superior back checkers to the test.
And we found that Moz was actually at the same level as the other tools. Both in terms of the links results quickly. And the total number of backs in its index.
The main problem with Moz Pro is that they charge $ 99 / month. And in my opinion you will shoot much more of this investment with SEMrush or Ahrefs.
Same s 'it is a bit dated, Majestic SEO is still one of the best SEO tools on the market.
Majestic 100% focus on back reporting. So if you want a tool that takes care of all your SEO tasks in one place, Majestic SEO is probably not the right solution for you.
But if all you care about is the back data, Majestic SEO is actually pretty solid.
In fact, in that back checker comparison I mentioned earlier, Majestic wasn't too far behindother great SEO tools.
In fact, for some sites it actually found more backs than SEMrush.
As you can read in my full Majestic review , I can't fault the data you find in the tool too much. It is actually solid technology.
The main problem is that the UX is super outdated.
And I'm not just talking about the look and feel. I really don't care. It's more that the backend is difficult to use. Especially compared to Ahrefs.
How Majestic compares to Ahrefs
In terms of pure back data, Majestic SEO is not a bad alternative to Ahrefs.
But you can't really rate a tool on the basis of data that it provides. You also need to take into account user experience, key features, customer support, etc.
And when you take all of that into account, Ahrefs has a length of 'advance.
For example, you can use Ahrefs for almost anys your SEO tasks. Keyword research. Technical SEO. Track rankings. And more.
Majestic has none of this. It 'sa 100% pure link building tool.
That said, the price of Majestic reflects the lack of features. It starts at $ 50 / month.
Which is about half the price of Ahrefs.
So , if you are someone who pretty much ONLY the backs, then you will probably get insane value for that 50 dollars.
But if you want all-in-one SEO software, Ahrefs is probably your best bet.
Next, let's take a look at BuzzSumo.
Unlike some of the other tools I've listed here, BuzzSumo isn't very SEO-focused. Rather, it is a content marketing tool .
So why is BuzzSumo offering this list of Ahrefs alternatives?
First of all, SEO and content marketing overlap. MANY.
In other wordsmes: your site can be perfectly optimized. But to rank today, your content has to be EXCELLENT.
Additionally, BuzzSumo has a few SEO-focused features (like a decent backs tool):
So yes, BuzzSumo is one of my favorite marketing tools. And it indirectly improved my SEO by improving my content.
How Buzzsumo Compares to Ahrefs
To be clear: Ahrefs and BuzzSumo are very different tools.
For example, BuzzSumo lacks many key SEO features in Ahrefs, as a site audit tool.
And Ahrefs lacks a lot of content-driven features in BuzzSumo, like mentioning tracking.
That said, there are has some overlap between the two tools. For example, both Ahrefs and BuzzSumo has features that help you find content with many shares on social media.
The question here n So is not: "How does BuzzSumo stack up againstAhrefs? ". It's more: "Do you want an SEO-focused tool (Ahrefs)?
Or a tool that helps with content marketing (BuzzSumo)? ”.
If you are 100% focused on improving your Google rankings , then I would stick with Ahrefs or one of the other tools I have. 've listed here. But if you want SEO to be more of a byproduct of your content marketing, you'll get a lot of value from BuzzSumo.
So yes, there is no right or wrong answer. It depends on what type of digital marketing you are currently focusing on.
Personally, I use both all the time. And since I'm more SEO-focused, I tend to use Ahrefs more often than BuzzSumo.
But I know a lot of people who use BuzzSumo every day and only log into Ahrefs every now and then. So it really depends.
Our last alternative to Ahrefs is Serpstat.
Serpstat is touted as an “all-in-one SEO platform”.
And this is widely delivered. Serpstat has the features you would expect from an SEO software suite, like backs analysis, organic ranking reports, etc.
That said, I don't follow not sure the features themselves are that good.
For example, when I look at the Best SEO Keywords for Backo report, it says my top 3 keywords are YouTube views, the pogosticking… and the "press release "?
Obviously I don't expect this report to be 100% accurate. You need my Google Analytics for that . But those numbers are a long way off.
Having said that, the "Back Dashboard " is pretty good. I used it to analyze my back profile. And it found that Backo has 21 , 4K referring domains.
This roughly matches the Ahrefs Site Explorer report.
How Serpstat compares to Ahrefs
Serpstat a many of the same as Ahrefs.
But I don't think any of them are as good as Ahrefs.
For example, my organic keywords report in Ahrefs is much more accurate than Serpstat:
They both technically have the same functionality. But one is much better than the other.
The only functionality of Serpstat that is comparable to Ahrefs is their back scan tool. It has a massive index. Plus, it is quite easy to use.
What do I 've missed?
So this is my list of 7 Ahrefs alternatives.
Now I would like to hear from you:
There is Are there any tools similar to Ahrefs that you use?
Let me know in the comments section below.