12 weeks to 6 months on average.
If you don't have that time, consider using a development framework. A framework will provide you with a basic structure for your site, including a grid system and basic layout elements and components, so you don't have to start from scratch. This is a major advantage whether you are building your first site or your hundredth or working on multiple projects at once.
This is why we are comparing two of the most popular frameworks: W3.CSS and Bootstrap . By understanding theirkey differences, you can make an informed decision to use for your next web project.
<- Call-to-Action Code -> <- end Call -to-Action Code ->
W3.CSS vs Bootstrap
Below, we'll take a closer look at these major differences and explore other reviews. Let's start.
W3.CSS vs Bootstrap: Programming languages
Knowing that W3.CSS and Bootstrap can be used as CSS frameworks only (or at least for most parts), let's see how they compare in terms of speed.
W3.CSS vs Bootstrap: ease of use
W3.CSS is considered an easier framework to learn and use for several reasons. Firstly, it is built only with HTML and CSS, which are easier to learn than other programming languages. Second, to charge theW3.CSS library on your site, you just need to add a reference to the stylesheet in your index.html file.
However, if you invest time in setting up and learning the Bootstrap framework, you will get yourself more power than with W3.CSS. You will be able, for example, to create drop-down lists, modals, popovers and carousels for all behaviors, commands and slide indicators - and more . This makes Bootstrap ideal for more advanced users with advanced needs.
W3.CSS vs Bootstrap: Speed
In some threads (like this one ), you will see people commenting that W3.CSS is faster than Bootstrap. But such a seemingly unequivocal statementthat is misleading. It is true that if you download each framework in its entirety, W3.CSS is lighter and therefore faster.
However, you don't need to download the entire Bootstrap. In fact, we encourage you to choose only the parts you need from the official documentation (below).
As a result, the framework can be just as light and efficient at speeding up your site.
W3.CSS vs Bootstrap: Usage
While this direct comparison shouldn't come down to a popularity contest, knowing how many sites are using each framework is an important variable among many to consider.
According to BuiltWith , Bootstrap is the most popular design framework on the entire Internet, powering over 20 million websites.
Given this number, it is reasonable to assume that many companies, agencies, and community members have developedThey use Bootstrap. This means using or at least familiarizing yourself with this framework can be important for job or design opportunities, blogging, interacting with other developers, etc.
BuiltWith detects more than 70,000 websites using the W3.CSS framework. While this is a much smaller number compared to using Bootstrap, it is still substantial on its own. It's also important to note that W3.CSS was released in 2016, six years after the first version of Bootstrap.
There are two things to remember as a result. First, this variable should not be used to exclude W3.CSS on its own. Second, if you have the time, it might be helpful to learn and use both frameworks.
The main differences between W3 CSS and Bootstrap
With W3.CSS or Bootstrap, you can create a website for your business without leavingir from zero. Choosing which one is right for you will largely depend on your preferred programming languages and how much time you are willing to invest in learning the framework and setting up your site.
We will summarize the main differences between the two frameworks below.
| || W3.CSS || Bootstrap |
| Price || Free || Free |
| Programming languages || HTML and CSS || |
| Ease of usetion || |
A shorter learning curve makes it ideal for novice programmers
| A steeper learning curve makes it ideal for more advanced programmers |
| Speed || |
Faster and lighter out of the box
| Can be just as fast and light if you only download the files you need |
| Usage || |
Powers over 70,000 sites
| Power over 20 million sites |
<- Call to action code -> <- - end to the code for calling the action ->
<- Code for calling the action action -> <-end Code for calling the action ->